NFPDF
Price
$26.50
Change
+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
PFODF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.05 (-1.96%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

NFPDF vs PFODF

Header iconNFPDF vs PFODF Comparison
Open Charts NFPDF vs PFODFBanner chart's image
Nissin Food Products
Price$26.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Premier Foods
Price$2.50
Change-$0.05 (-1.96%)
Volume$1.27K
CapitalizationN/A
NFPDF vs PFODF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFPDF vs. PFODF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFPDF is a Buy and PFODF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NFPDF: $26.50 vs. PFODF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: NFPDF and PFODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFPDF: 29% vs. PFODF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NFPDF: $8.64B vs. PFODF: $1.42B
NFPDF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $8.64B. PFODF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFODF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NFPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFODF is a better buy in the long-term than NFPDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFPDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFODF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFPDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PFODF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFODF is a better buy in the short-term than NFPDF.

Price Growth

NFPDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFODF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFPDF($8.64B) has a higher market cap than PFODF($1.42B). NFPDF has higher P/E ratio than PFODF: NFPDF (27.70) vs PFODF (10.10). PFODF YTD gains are higher at: 56.250 vs. NFPDF (-19.534). NFPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 85.1B vs. PFODF (178M). NFPDF has more cash in the bank: 89.1B vs. PFODF (64.4M). PFODF has less debt than NFPDF: PFODF (339M) vs NFPDF (41.1B). NFPDF has higher revenues than PFODF: NFPDF (646B) vs PFODF (1.01B).
NFPDFPFODFNFPDF / PFODF
Capitalization8.64B1.42B611%
EBITDA85.1B178M47,809%
Gain YTD-19.53456.250-35%
P/E Ratio27.7010.10274%
Revenue646B1.01B64,215%
Total Cash89.1B64.4M138,354%
Total Debt41.1B339M12,124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NFPDF vs PFODF: Fundamental Ratings
NFPDF
PFODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4745
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7231
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NFPDF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PFODF (53). This means that NFPDF’s stock grew similarly to PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NFPDF (100). This means that PFODF’s stock grew significantly faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NFPDF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFODF (86). This means that NFPDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PFODF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as NFPDF (57). This means that PFODF’s stock grew similarly to NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

PFODF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (72). This means that PFODF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFPDFPFODF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIPIX33.65N/A
N/A
SEI Mid-Cap I (SIMT)
VRSGX39.53N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth R6
MEMQX7.71N/A
N/A
Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Y3
BIGFX26.73-0.12
-0.45%
Baron International Growth Retail
CNGAX62.84-6.32
-9.14%
American Funds New Economy 529A

NFPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFPDF and ARRT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFPDF and ARRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFPDF
1D Price
Change %
NFPDF100%
N/A
ARRT - NFPDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCRA - NFPDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+30.64%
LYSFY - NFPDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - NFPDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-9.69%
PFODF - NFPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PFODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFODF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFODF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFODF
1D Price
Change %
PFODF100%
N/A
STKL - PFODF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
PIFMY - PFODF
12%
Poorly correlated
+5.60%
ORKLY - PFODF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
NFPDF - PFODF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFFY - PFODF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More