Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs PFFRX
NFRFX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRFX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRFX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.97B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: NFRFX (8.14) vs PFFRX (7.49). NFRFX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: NFRFX (11 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.70) and NFRFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. NFRFX (24.00). PFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: PFFRX (2500) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX (7.83) and PFFRX (7.69) have marching annual gain over last year. NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.52 vs. PFFRX (37.57).
| NFRFX | PFFRX | NFRFX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.616 | 3.701 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 4.97B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.14 | 7.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 7.69 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.58 | 28.74 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.52 | 37.57 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.58 | 61.41 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers