Ad is loading...
NFRFX vs PFFRX
NFRFX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRFX vs. PFFRX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRFX is a StrongBuy and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.56B vs. NFRFX (1.48B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: NFRFX (8.58) vs PFFRX (8.01). NFRFX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: NFRFX (10 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.70) and NFRFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. NFRFX (24.00). PFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: PFFRX (2500) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX (7.02) and PFFRX (6.68) have marching annual gain over last year. NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. PFFRX (40.99).
| NFRFX | PFFRX | NFRFX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.167 | -0.156 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 4.56B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.58 | 8.01 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 6.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 21.92 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.45 | 40.99 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.96 | 56.26 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers