Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs PFFRX
NFRFX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRFX vs. PFFRX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRFX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 5.2B vs. NFRFX (2.03B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: NFRFX (7.99) vs PFFRX (7.28). NFRFX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: NFRFX (11 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.69) and NFRFX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. NFRFX (24.00). PFFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: PFFRX (2500) vs NFRFX (1000000). PFFRX (6.89) and NFRFX (6.71) have marching annual gain over last year. NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.96 vs. PFFRX (36.84).
| NFRFX | PFFRX | NFRFX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.69 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.425 | 4.612 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 5.2B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.99 | 7.28 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 6.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | 31.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.96 | 36.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.78 | 64.48 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement