Ad is loading...
NGDAX vs RGAGX
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDAX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
Price$25.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$66.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. NGDAX (2.12B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDAX: RGAGX (0.71) vs NGDAX (0.00). NGDAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDAX: RGAGX (250) vs NGDAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.51 vs. NGDAX (-3.36). NGDAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.64 vs. RGAGX (38.90).
| NGDAX | RGAGX | NGDAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.452 | -10.999 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.36 | -2.51 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.29 | 6.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.64 | 38.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.55 | 49.89 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...