Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDAX vs RGAGX
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDAX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
Price$31.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.44
Change+$0.34 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NGDAX (2.55B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDAX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NGDAX (0.00). NGDAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDAX: RGAGX (250) vs NGDAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. NGDAX (7.56). NGDAX (48.52) and RGAGX (47.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDAX | RGAGX | NGDAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.333 | 11.925 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 9.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 60.22 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.52 | 47.59 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.78 | 84.21 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers