Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDAX vs RGAHX
NGDAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NGDAX vs RGAHX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
Price$32.90
Change-$0.13 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.52
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
NGDAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. NGDAX (2.67B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NGDAX: RGAHX (0.45) vs NGDAX (0.00). NGDAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NGDAX (16 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NGDAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NGDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDAX: RGAHX (250) vs NGDAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. NGDAX (13.86). RGAHX (43.58) and NGDAX (42.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDAX | RGAHX | NGDAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.44 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.44 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.251 | 19.172 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 343B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 15.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.54 | 75.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.94 | 43.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement