Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDCX vs RGAHX
NGDCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGAHX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$32.63
Change-$0.42 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.73
Change-$0.59 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
NGDCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. NGDCX (2.64B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NGDCX (16 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NGDCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGAHX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). NGDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. RGAHX (7.29). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.63 vs. NGDCX (29.65).
| NGDCX | RGAHX | NGDCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.44 | 402% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.44 | 402% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.559 | 15.373 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 7.29 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.40 | 62.36 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.65 | 33.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.33 | 88.07 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers