Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDCX vs RGAHX
NGDCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGAHX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$31.03
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.08
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
NGDCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NGDCX (2.66B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGAHX (0.45) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NGDCX (16 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NGDCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGAHX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.01 vs. NGDCX (10.91). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 45.37 vs. NGDCX (36.42).
| NGDCX | RGAHX | NGDCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.44 | 402% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.44 | 402% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.145 | 19.935 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 15.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.10 | 76.39 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 45.37 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement