Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDRX vs RGACX
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$33.77
Change+$0.19 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NGDRX (2.69B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGACX (0.07) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDRX (17 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NGDRX (0) vs RGACX (250). NGDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.16 vs. RGACX (8.67). NGDRX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. RGACX (32.17).
| NGDRX | RGACX | NGDRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.330 | 19.433 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 8.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.43 | 67.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.46 | 32.17 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.48 | 90.41 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement