Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDRX vs RGACX
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$32.46
Change+$0.26 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.09
Change+$0.64 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NGDRX (2.66B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGACX (0.07) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDRX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NGDRX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. NGDRX (11.30). RGACX (40.04) and NGDRX (38.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDRX | RGACX | NGDRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.580 | 19.586 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 14.19 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.13 | 74.27 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.33 | 40.04 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.07 | 101.32 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement