Ad is loading...
NGDRX vs RGACX
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$27.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. NGDRX (2.33B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGACX (0.08) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDRX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NGDRX (0) vs RGACX (250). NGDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. RGACX (2.58). NGDRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.54 vs. RGACX (41.87).
| NGDRX | RGACX | NGDRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.563 | -2.667 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | 2.58 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.67 | 31.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.54 | 41.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.43 | 58.36 | 64% |