Ad is loading...
NGUAX vs RGACX
NGUAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGUAX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth I
Price$28.24
Change+$0.13 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
NGUAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGUAX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGUAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. NGUAX (2.32B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGUAX: RGACX (0.08) vs NGUAX (0.07). NGUAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGUAX (75 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NGUAX (0.81). NGUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGUAX: RGACX (250) vs NGUAX (1000). NGUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. RGACX (3.09). NGUAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.89 vs. RGACX (42.06).
| NGUAX | RGACX | NGUAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 75 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.212 | -2.542 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 284B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.08 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | 3.09 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.16 | 32.79 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.89 | 42.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.88 | 58.28 | 89% |