Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGUAX vs RGACX
NGUAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGUAX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth I
Price$32.76
Change+$0.22 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.04
Change+$0.52 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
NGUAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGUAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGUAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NGUAX (2.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGUAX: RGACX (0.07) vs NGUAX (0.06). NGUAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGUAX (75 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NGUAX (0.81). NGUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGUAX: RGACX (250) vs NGUAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. NGUAX (13.22). NGUAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.47 vs. RGACX (35.74).
| NGUAX | RGACX | NGUAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 75 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.438 | 15.349 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 15.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.37 | 53.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | 35.74 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.19 | 95.87 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement