Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PIMAX
NHCCX vs PIMAX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PIMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
Victory Pioneer High Income Mun A
Price$6.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets952.3M
NHCCX vs PIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PIMAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. PIMAX (952M). PIMAX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: PIMAX (5.28) vs NHCCX (4.69). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PIMAX: NHCCX (12 years) vs PIMAX (19 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than PIMAX (0.87). PIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIMAX: NHCCX (200) vs PIMAX (1000). PIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.34 vs. NHCCX (-1.99). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.89 vs. PIMAX (2.99).
| NHCCX | PIMAX | NHCCX / PIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.82 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.87 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.037 | -0.788 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 1000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 952M | 1,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.69 | 5.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | -0.34 | 588% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 8.66 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.89 | 2.99 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.44 | 28.36 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement