NHIC
Price
$10.18
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
281.1M
SLAMF
Price
$11.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
166.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NHIC vs SLAMF

Header iconNHIC vs SLAMF Comparison
Open Charts NHIC vs SLAMFBanner chart's image
Newhold Investment Corp III
Price$10.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Volume$98.71K
Capitalization281.1M
Slam
Price$11.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$113
Capitalization166.83M
NHIC vs SLAMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NHIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHIC vs. SLAMF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHIC is a Buy and SLAMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NHIC: $10.18 vs. SLAMF: $11.57)
Brand notoriety: NHIC and SLAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHIC: 282% vs. SLAMF: 32%
Market capitalization -- NHIC: $281.1M vs. SLAMF: $166.83M
NHIC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $281.1M. SLAMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $166.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHIC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NHIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NHIC and SLAMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NHIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NHIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLAMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLAMF is a better buy in the short-term than NHIC.

Price Growth

NHIC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHIC($281M) has a higher market cap than SLAMF($167M). NHIC has more cash in the bank: 1.57M vs. SLAMF (66).
NHICSLAMFNHIC / SLAMF
Capitalization281M167M168%
EBITDAN/A-1.97M-
Gain YTDN/A1.938-
P/E RatioN/A144.63-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash1.57M662,374,242%
Total DebtN/A14.5M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NHICSLAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NHIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNVGY13.830.05
+0.36%
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP
AAVXF86.10N/A
N/A
Abivax SA
RTOBF3.60N/A
N/A
Ratos AB
CCUR2500.00N/A
N/A
CCUR Holdings, Inc.
AINMF1.13N/A
N/A
NETRAMARK HLDGS INC.

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with MNTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then MNTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
LGYV - SLAMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEGR - SLAMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBOE - SLAMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - SLAMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More