NHMAF
Price
$4.31
Change
+$0.13 (+3.11%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
NRSCF
Price
$6.11
Change
+$0.18 (+3.04%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

NHMAF vs NRSCF

Header iconNHMAF vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts NHMAF vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Nihon M and A Center
Price$4.31
Change+$0.13 (+3.11%)
Volume$228
CapitalizationN/A
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.11
Change+$0.18 (+3.04%)
Volume$162
CapitalizationN/A
NHMAF vs NRSCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHMAF vs. NRSCF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAF is a Hold and NRSCF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (NHMAF: $4.31 vs. NRSCF: $6.11)
Brand notoriety: NHMAF and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHMAF: 188% vs. NRSCF: 1%
Market capitalization -- NHMAF: $1.87B vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
NHMAF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.87B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NHMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than NHMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NHMAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NHMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NHMAF and NRSCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NHMAF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.07% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.56% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRSCF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than NHMAF($1.87B). NHMAF has higher P/E ratio than NRSCF: NHMAF (25.00) vs NRSCF (18.52). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 38.549 vs. NHMAF (-15.007). NHMAF has less debt than NRSCF: NHMAF (500M) vs NRSCF (11.4T). NRSCF has higher revenues than NHMAF: NRSCF (1.12T) vs NHMAF (36B).
NHMAFNRSCFNHMAF / NRSCF
Capitalization1.87B12.8B15%
EBITDA12.1BN/A-
Gain YTD-15.00738.549-39%
P/E Ratio25.0018.52135%
Revenue36B1.12T3%
Total Cash44BN/A-
Total Debt500M11.4T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NHMAF vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
NHMAF
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NHMAF (99). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHMAF (100). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (31). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (59). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (96). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NHMAFNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHRAX18.620.30
+1.64%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs A
GIZRX12.090.16
+1.34%
Invesco Global Infrastructure R
SGRKX36.280.42
+1.17%
Allspring Growth Admin
CMLEX54.840.55
+1.01%
American Funds American Mutual 529E
MRCGX31.940.32
+1.01%
Meridian Growth C

NHMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHMAF and HGBL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHMAF and HGBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHMAF
1D Price
Change %
NHMAF100%
N/A
HGBL - NHMAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
OTCM - NHMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
NRSCF - NHMAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLNH - NHMAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
OSCUF - NHMAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.97%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and NMR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
NMR - NRSCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
CCORF - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
MQBKY - NRSCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
MCQEF - NRSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPPTF - NRSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+13.51%
More