Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMFX vs PRFHX
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.24B
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PRFHX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. PRFHX (3.24B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMFX (5.67) vs PRFHX (3.99). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHMFX (1000000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.01 vs. NHMFX (-2.84). NHMFX (8.95) and PRFHX (8.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NHMFX | PRFHX | NHMFX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.549 | -1.920 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 3.24B | 413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 3.99 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.84 | 1.01 | -281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.07 | 5.58 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.95 | 8.55 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers