Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMFX vs PRFHX
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.77
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.65B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2B
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PRFHX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. PRFHX (3.2B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMFX (5.82) vs PRFHX (4.11). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PRFHX (41 years). NHMFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHMFX (1000000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.45 vs. NHMFX (-5.70). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.68 vs. PRFHX (5.37).
| NHMFX | PRFHX | NHMFX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.63 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.63 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.792 | -1.413 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 3.2B | 397% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.82 | 4.11 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.70 | -1.45 | 393% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.20 | 8.86 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.68 | 5.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement