Ad is loading...
NHMFX vs PRFHX
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.15
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.31B
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PRFHX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. PRFHX (3.31B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMFX (5.58) vs PRFHX (3.97). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHMFX (1000000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. NHMFX (0.24). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.56 vs. PRFHX (12.67).
| NHMFX | PRFHX | NHMFX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.434 | -1.804 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 3.31B | 414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.58 | 3.97 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | 1.94 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.50 | 9.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.56 | 12.67 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.00 | - |