Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMFX vs PRFHX
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.63
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21B
NHMFX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. PRFHX (3.21B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMFX (5.84) vs PRFHX (4.09). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHMFX (1000000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.81 vs. NHMFX (-5.76). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.51 vs. PRFHX (4.08).
| NHMFX | PRFHX | NHMFX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.826 | -2.702 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 3.21B | 411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.84 | 4.09 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.76 | -1.81 | 319% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.10 | 4.07 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.51 | 4.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers