NIHL
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
38.28M
RSTRF
Price
$71.07
Change
+$4.03 (+6.01%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NIHL vs RSTRF

Header iconNIHL vs RSTRF Comparison
Open Charts NIHL vs RSTRFBanner chart's image
New Infinity Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization38.28M
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
Price$71.07
Change+$4.03 (+6.01%)
Volume$712
Capitalization22.6B
NIHL vs RSTRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIHL vs. RSTRF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIHL is a Hold and RSTRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NIHL: $0.08 vs. RSTRF: $70.45)
Brand notoriety: NIHL and RSTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIHL: 3% vs. RSTRF: 86%
Market capitalization -- NIHL: $38.28M vs. RSTRF: $22.6B
NIHL [@Restaurants] is valued at $38.28M. RSTRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $22.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIHL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSTRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the long-term than NIHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIHL’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSTRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NIHL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSTRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the short-term than NIHL.

Price Growth

NIHL (@Restaurants) experienced а -22.50% price change this week, while RSTRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSTRF($22.6B) has a higher market cap than NIHL($38.3M). RSTRF YTD gains are higher at: 1.924 vs. NIHL (-92.250).
NIHLRSTRFNIHL / RSTRF
Capitalization38.3M22.6B0%
EBITDAN/A2.57B-
Gain YTD-92.2501.924-4,795%
P/E RatioN/A23.93-
RevenueN/A8.78B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A15.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIHL vs RSTRF: Fundamental Ratings
NIHL
RSTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
10035
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIHL's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSTRF (98). This means that NIHL’s stock grew significantly faster than RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIHL (100). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIHL (100). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

NIHL's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RSTRF (54). This means that NIHL’s stock grew similarly to RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NIHL (100). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew significantly faster than NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIHLRSTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPG25.960.20
+0.78%
DORIAN LPG Ltd
SOHU13.780.09
+0.66%
Sohu.com Limited
CHSCL25.470.04
+0.16%
CHS
VIPS14.99-0.08
-0.53%
Vipshop Holdings Limited
IROQ24.28-0.26
-1.06%
IF Bancorp

NIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIHL and DPZ have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIHL and DPZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIHL
1D Price
Change %
NIHL100%
-22.50%
DPZ - NIHL
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
SGLOF - NIHL
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - NIHL
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
RSTRF - NIHL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARZF - NIHL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSTRF and SGLOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSTRF and SGLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSTRF
1D Price
Change %
RSTRF100%
N/A
SGLOF - RSTRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEN - RSTRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
MTYFF - RSTRF
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.66%
PZRIF - RSTRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
RTBRF - RSTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More