NILIF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
64.2M
PLL
Price
$8.14
Change
-$0.45 (-5.24%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NILIF vs PLL

Header iconNILIF vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts NILIF vs PLLBanner chart's image
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.89K
Capitalization64.2M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$8.14
Change-$0.45 (-5.24%)
Volume$384.69K
Capitalization256.53M
NILIF vs PLL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NILIF vs. PLL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NILIF is a Buy and PLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NILIF: $0.20 vs. PLL: $8.14)
Brand notoriety: NILIF and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NILIF: 4% vs. PLL: 104%
Market capitalization -- NILIF: $64.2M vs. PLL: $256.53M
NILIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $64.2M. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NILIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the long-term than NILIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NILIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NILIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLL is a better buy in the short-term than NILIF.

Price Growth

NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.19% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLL($257M) has a higher market cap than NILIF($64.2M). PLL YTD gains are higher at: -6.865 vs. NILIF (-21.851). NILIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.19M vs. PLL (-18.36M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. NILIF (2.12M). NILIF has less debt than PLL: NILIF (18.4K) vs PLL (1.57M). PLL has higher revenues than NILIF: PLL (39.8M) vs NILIF (0).
NILIFPLLNILIF / PLL
Capitalization64.2M257M25%
EBITDA-3.19M-18.36M17%
Gain YTD-21.851-6.865318%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue039.8M-
Total Cash2.12M72.2M3%
Total Debt18.4K1.57M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NILIF vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
NILIF
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1720
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8695
SMR RATING
1..100
9794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLL's Valuation (28) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NILIF (49) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

NILIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (95) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that NILIF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's SMR Rating (94) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NILIF (97) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NILIF (59) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NILIF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NILIFPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDWBY4.420.28
+6.66%
BUDWEISER BREWING CO APAC LTD.
TETHF0.92N/A
N/A
Tethys Petroleum, Ltd.
RLYGF0.16N/A
N/A
Riley Gold Corp.
SAPMF2.83N/A
N/A
Saipem S.p.A.
AGLXY6.60-0.01
-0.23%
AGL Energy Ltd

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NILIF has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NILIF jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
-1.40%
PLL - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.24%
LAC - NILIF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
ERO - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
BDNNY - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
HBM - NILIF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
More

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
-5.24%
LAR - PLL
55%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
LAC - PLL
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.69%
SGML - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
FSUGY - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
GLNCY - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
More