Ad is loading...
NIPNF
Price
$83.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
NTDTY
Price
$17.30
Change
-$0.72 (-4.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

NIPNF vs NTDTY

Header iconNIPNF vs NTDTY Comparison
Open Charts NIPNF vs NTDTYBanner chart's image
NEC
Price$83.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NTT DATA GROUP
Price$17.30
Change-$0.72 (-4.00%)
Volume$2.92K
CapitalizationN/A
NIPNF vs NTDTY Comparison Chart
Loading...
NTDTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIPNF vs. NTDTY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIPNF is a Buy and NTDTY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NIPNF: $83.00 vs. NTDTY: $17.30)
Brand notoriety: NIPNF and NTDTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIPNF: 11% vs. NTDTY: 46%
Market capitalization -- NIPNF: $21.68B vs. NTDTY: $24.37B
NIPNF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $21.68B. NTDTY’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $24.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIPNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTDTY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NTDTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the long-term than NTDTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTDTY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NTDTY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTDTY (@Information Technology Services) price change was -7.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-3.15% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTDTY($24.4B) has a higher market cap than NIPNF($21.7B). NTDTY has higher P/E ratio than NIPNF: NTDTY (27.38) vs NIPNF (23.06). NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 50.690 vs. NTDTY (22.716). NTDTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 678B vs. NIPNF (377B). NTDTY has higher revenues than NIPNF: NTDTY (4.37T) vs NIPNF (3.42T).
NIPNFNTDTYNIPNF / NTDTY
Capitalization21.7B24.4B89%
EBITDA377B678B56%
Gain YTD50.69022.716223%
P/E Ratio23.0627.3884%
Revenue3.42T4.37T78%
Total Cash495BN/A-
Total Debt647BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIPNF vs NTDTY: Fundamental Ratings
NIPNF
NTDTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1759
SMR RATING
1..100
10070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6856
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIPNF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTDTY (50). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTDTY’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTDTY (59). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTDTY’s over the last 12 months.

NTDTY's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (100). This means that NTDTY’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NTDTY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (45). This means that NTDTY’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NTDTY's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (68). This means that NTDTY’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTDTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NTDTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBDU22.900.03
+0.13%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF
FIXT39.79N/A
N/A
Procure ETF Trust II Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
WLDR33.62-0.65
-1.90%
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
IGPT45.69-1.16
-2.48%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
FBY18.39-0.73
-3.82%
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
N/A
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
QUISF - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.65%
More

NTDTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTDTY and NRILY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTDTY and NRILY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTDTY
1D Price
Change %
NTDTY100%
-4.02%
NRILY - NTDTY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
NURAF - NTDTY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
FJTSY - NTDTY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
BR - NTDTY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
GIB - NTDTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More