NIPNF
Price
$32.80
Change
+$2.19 (+7.15%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
41.21B
POSAF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NIPNF vs POSAF

Header iconNIPNF vs POSAF Comparison
Open Charts NIPNF vs POSAFBanner chart's image
NEC
Price$32.80
Change+$2.19 (+7.15%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization41.21B
Posabit Systems
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.55K
Capitalization4.67M
NIPNF vs POSAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIPNF vs. POSAF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIPNF is a Buy and POSAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NIPNF: $32.80 vs. POSAF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: NIPNF and POSAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIPNF: 216% vs. POSAF: 60%
Market capitalization -- NIPNF: $40.32B vs. POSAF: $7M
NIPNF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $40.32B. POSAF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $233.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $9.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIPNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOSAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POSAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the long-term than POSAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIPNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POSAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NIPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • POSAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the short-term than POSAF.

Price Growth

NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +13.89% price change this week, while POSAF (@Information Technology Services) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

POSAF is expected to report earnings on May 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-1.30% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIPNF($41.2B) has a higher market cap than POSAF($4.67M). NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 89.661 vs. POSAF (-46.981). NIPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 377B vs. POSAF (-4.01M). NIPNF has higher revenues than POSAF: NIPNF (3.42T) vs POSAF (14.4M).
NIPNFPOSAFNIPNF / POSAF
Capitalization41.2B4.67M882,038%
EBITDA377B-4.01M-9,390,584%
Gain YTD89.661-46.981-191%
P/E Ratio36.62N/A-
Revenue3.42T14.4M23,715,278%
Total CashN/A736K-
Total DebtN/A4.54M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIPNF vs POSAF: Fundamental Ratings
NIPNF
POSAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3897
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIPNF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (72). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as POSAF (100). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as POSAF (100). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (97). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (65). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIPNFPOSAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOOO50.900.66
+1.31%
BRP
BBVA17.280.22
+1.29%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
NTWK4.340.06
+1.28%
NetSol Technologies
KRP14.860.12
+0.81%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP
SMID36.91-0.20
-0.54%
Smith-Midland Corp

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
+7.14%
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.16%
NOSUF - NIPNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

POSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSAF and SPSAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSAF and SPSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSAF
1D Price
Change %
POSAF100%
N/A
SPSAF - POSAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXDCF - POSAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSSI - POSAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
NIPNF - POSAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
NTDTY - POSAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
More