NIPNF
Price
$28.10
Change
+$0.65 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
34.78B
POSAF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
8.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NIPNF vs POSAF

Header iconNIPNF vs POSAF Comparison
Open Charts NIPNF vs POSAFBanner chart's image
NEC
Price$28.10
Change+$0.65 (+2.37%)
Volume$326
Capitalization34.78B
Posabit Systems
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.65K
Capitalization8.8M
NIPNF vs POSAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIPNF vs. POSAF commentary
Jul 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIPNF is a Hold and POSAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 15, 2025
Stock price -- (NIPNF: $28.10 vs. POSAF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: NIPNF and POSAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIPNF: 74% vs. POSAF: 36%
Market capitalization -- NIPNF: $34.78B vs. POSAF: $8.8M
NIPNF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $34.78B. POSAF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $8.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $263.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIPNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOSAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POSAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the long-term than POSAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIPNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POSAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NIPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • POSAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the short-term than POSAF.

Price Growth

NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while POSAF (@Information Technology Services) price change was -15.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

POSAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+1.58% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIPNF($34.8B) has a higher market cap than POSAF($8.8M). NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 62.484 vs. POSAF (0.943). NIPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 377B vs. POSAF (-4.01M). NIPNF has higher revenues than POSAF: NIPNF (3.42T) vs POSAF (14.4M).
NIPNFPOSAFNIPNF / POSAF
Capitalization34.8B8.8M395,365%
EBITDA377B-4.01M-9,390,584%
Gain YTD62.4840.9436,623%
P/E Ratio31.39N/A-
Revenue3.42T14.4M23,715,278%
Total CashN/A736K-
Total DebtN/A4.54M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIPNF vs POSAF: Fundamental Ratings
NIPNF
POSAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3988
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2764
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIPNF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (73). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

POSAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (100). This means that POSAF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

POSAF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (100). This means that POSAF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (88). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POSAF (64). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POSAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIPNFPOSAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMN7.050.04
+0.57%
Aris Mining Corp
SISI0.18N/A
-0.49%
Shineco Inc
EVRG68.96-0.46
-0.66%
Evergy
SNEX91.44-4.91
-5.10%
StoneX Group Inc
ABAT1.68-0.10
-5.62%
American Battery Technology Company

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
N/A
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-8.39%
NOSUF - NIPNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.33%
More

POSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSAF and SPSAF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSAF and SPSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSAF
1D Price
Change %
POSAF100%
-0.93%
SPSAF - POSAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXDCF - POSAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSSI - POSAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.54%
NIPNF - POSAF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTDTY - POSAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More