Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs REREX
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.79
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$60.56
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. REREX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a StrongBuy and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NIQCX (1.13B). REREX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: REREX (0.73) vs NIQCX (0.36). NIQCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NIQCX (13 years) vs REREX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: REREX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. NIQCX (5.63). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 9.06 vs. NIQCX (6.77).
| NIQCX | REREX | NIQCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.82 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.82 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.906 | 15.771 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.73 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 5.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.72 | 30.89 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.77 | 9.06 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.97 | 37.43 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement