Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs REREX
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.71
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$58.47
Change+$0.66 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.03B
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. REREX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Hold and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NIQCX (1.18B). REREX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: REREX (1.06) vs NIQCX (0.36). NIQCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NIQCX (12 years) vs REREX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: REREX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). NIQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. REREX (5.45). REREX (18.34) and NIQCX (17.53) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NIQCX | REREX | NIQCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.82 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.82 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.787 | 11.776 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 5.45 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.46 | 25.35 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.53 | 18.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.86 | 23.74 | 126% |