Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs REREX
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$59.25
Change+$0.19 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. REREX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Buy and REREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NIQCX (1.19B). REREX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: REREX (1.06) vs NIQCX (0.36). NIQCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NIQCX (12 years) vs REREX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. REREX (30.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: REREX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). NIQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. REREX (2.75). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 18.33 vs. NIQCX (14.22).
| NIQCX | REREX | NIQCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.82 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.82 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.746 | 13.267 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 2.75 | 377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.35 | 16.80 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.22 | 18.33 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.92 | 25.70 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement