Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.79
Change-$0.12 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$65.36
Change-$0.35 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NIQCX (1.13B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (0.85) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (13 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. NIQCX (8.71). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.31 vs. NIQCX (7.24).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.185 | 21.804 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 10.59 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.76 | 50.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.24 | 15.31 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.41 | 45.03 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement