Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$60.86
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NIQCX (1.19B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (1.32) vs NIQCX (0.36). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (12 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). NIQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. RERFX (3.20). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.07 vs. NIQCX (14.22).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.746 | 13.418 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.32 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 3.20 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.35 | 17.84 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.22 | 20.07 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.92 | 28.09 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement