Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.66
Change+$0.43 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.11B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Nov 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. NIQCX (1.04B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (0.83) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (13 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.86 vs. NIQCX (8.71). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.60 vs. NIQCX (-3.06).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.870 | 18.636 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 131B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.83 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 12.86 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.94 | 31.66 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | 4.60 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.49 | 40.90 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers