Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$60.71
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.7B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. NIQCX (1.14B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (0.90) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (12 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). NIQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. RERFX (4.49). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.33 vs. NIQCX (11.04).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.186 | 13.045 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | 4.49 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 31.42 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.04 | 15.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.70 | 25.26 | 114% |