It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NITO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NITO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
NITO (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -1.98% price change this week, while NTR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -5.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.24%.
NITO is expected to report earnings on Nov 29, 2023.
NTR is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
NITO | NTR | NITO / NTR | |
Capitalization | 3.87M | 27.3B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 4.89B | - |
Gain YTD | -88.983 | -14.212 | 626% |
P/E Ratio | 0.07 | 21.68 | 0% |
Revenue | N/A | 29.1B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 941M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 12.6B | - |
NITO | NTR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTR's Valuation (21) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (49) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (100) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's SMR Rating (84) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (97) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as NITO (65) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to NITO’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NITO (72) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NITO’s over the last 12 months.
NITO | NTR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 11 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NITO and MULG have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NITO and MULG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NITO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NITO | 100% | -4.24% | ||
MULG - NITO | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BHIL - NITO | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
NTR - NITO | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
CBLUF - NITO | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MOS - NITO | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTR has been closely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTR jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.