NKOSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
25.01M
WPM
Price
$68.05
Change
-$1.90 (-2.72%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.35B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NKOSF vs WPM

Header iconNKOSF vs WPM Comparison
Open Charts NKOSF vs WPMBanner chart's image
Labrador Gold
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$57.18K
Capitalization25.01M
Wheaton Precious Metals
Price$68.05
Change-$1.90 (-2.72%)
Volume$1.8M
Capitalization21.35B
NKOSF vs WPM Comparison Chart
Loading...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NKOSF vs. WPM commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NKOSF is a Hold and WPM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NKOSF: $0.06 vs. WPM: $68.05)
Brand notoriety: NKOSF: Not notable vs. WPM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NKOSF: 75% vs. WPM: 124%
Market capitalization -- NKOSF: $25.01M vs. WPM: $21.35B
NKOSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.01M. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $21.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NKOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NKOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the long-term than NKOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WPM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NKOSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +19.10% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

WPM is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($21.3B) has a higher market cap than NKOSF($25M). NKOSF YTD gains are higher at: 34.884 vs. WPM (20.999). WPM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 755M vs. NKOSF (-1.22M). WPM has more cash in the bank: 547M vs. NKOSF (15.7M). WPM has higher revenues than NKOSF: WPM (1.02B) vs NKOSF (0).
NKOSFWPMNKOSF / WPM
Capitalization25M21.3B0%
EBITDA-1.22M755M-0%
Gain YTD34.88420.999166%
P/E RatioN/A40.30-
Revenue01.02B-
Total Cash15.7M547M3%
Total DebtN/A6.23M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NKOSF vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
NKOSF
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
8973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10015
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WPM's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKOSF (78) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NKOSF (100) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew significantly faster than NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's SMR Rating (73) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NKOSF (89) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NKOSF (43) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NKOSF (100) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew significantly faster than NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAMI0.25N/A
+0.08%
Farmmi
ALLE127.160.05
+0.04%
Allegion Public Limited
LFT2.73-0.01
-0.36%
Lument Finance Trust
FTDR57.10-1.32
-2.26%
Frontdoor
EWCZ6.57-0.25
-3.67%
European Wax Center

NKOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKOSF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKOSF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKOSF
1D Price
Change %
NKOSF100%
+10.27%
SSVRF - NKOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
EQX - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
MTA - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
DYNR - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WPM - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
More