NL
Price
$6.52
Change
-$0.04 (-0.61%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
318.59M
77 days until earnings call
RBA
Price
$117.42
Change
-$0.60 (-0.51%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.87B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NL vs RBA

Header iconNL vs RBA Comparison
Open Charts NL vs RBABanner chart's image
NL Industries
Price$6.52
Change-$0.04 (-0.61%)
Volume$100
Capitalization318.59M
RB Global
Price$117.42
Change-$0.60 (-0.51%)
Volume$9.3K
Capitalization21.87B
NL vs RBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NL vs. RBA commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NL is a Hold and RBA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (NL: $6.56 vs. RBA: $118.02)
Brand notoriety: NL and RBA are both not notable
NL represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while RBA is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NL: 72% vs. RBA: 165%
Market capitalization -- NL: $318.59M vs. RBA: $21.89B
NL [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $318.59M. RBA’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $21.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $90.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.52B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBA is a better buy in the long-term than NL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RBA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NL is a better buy in the short-term than RBA.

Price Growth

NL (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +15.09% price change this week, while RBA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

NL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

RBA is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.57% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBA($21.9B) has a higher market cap than NL($319M). RBA has higher P/E ratio than NL: RBA (57.85) vs NL (5.93). RBA YTD gains are higher at: 31.588 vs. NL (-13.362). RBA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.38B vs. NL (81M). RBA has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. NL (110M). NL has less debt than RBA: NL (500K) vs RBA (4.25B). RBA has higher revenues than NL: RBA (4.33B) vs NL (148M).
NLRBANL / RBA
Capitalization319M21.9B1%
EBITDA81M1.38B6%
Gain YTD-13.36231.588-42%
P/E Ratio5.9357.8510%
Revenue148M4.33B3%
Total Cash110M578M19%
Total Debt500K4.25B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NL vs RBA: Fundamental Ratings
NL
RBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
466
SMR RATING
1..100
5378
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NL's Valuation (8) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBA (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NL’s stock grew significantly faster than RBA’s over the last 12 months.

RBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NL (46) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NL’s over the last 12 months.

NL's SMR Rating (53) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as RBA (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that NL’s stock grew similarly to RBA’s over the last 12 months.

RBA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as NL (60) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew similarly to NL’s over the last 12 months.

RBA's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for NL (96) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that RBA’s stock grew significantly faster than NL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFLI50.100.40
+0.81%
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
CMU3.360.02
+0.60%
MFS High Yield Municipal Trust
TBFG28.60N/A
N/A
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
OXLC3.53-0.01
-0.28%
Oxford Lane Capital Corp
REK17.01-0.13
-0.73%
ProShares Short Real Estate

RBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBA has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBA jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBA
1D Price
Change %
RBA100%
+1.21%
PRSU - RBA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
AZZ - RBA
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
MSA - RBA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
CTAS - RBA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
GHC - RBA
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More