Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAFX
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAFX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$33.85
Change+$0.40 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.28M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$82.84
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NLCCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NLCCX (844M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAFX (0.57) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. NLCCX (5.12). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.12 vs. NLCCX (-11.46).
| NLCCX | RGAFX | NLCCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.34 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.353 | 11.314 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 844M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 11.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | 60.78 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.46 | 51.12 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.20 | 88.74 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement