Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGEBX
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$35.48
Change+$0.18 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets815.12M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.36
Change+$0.62 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. NLCCX (815M). NLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. RGEBX (4.48). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.19 vs. NLCCX (-16.48).
| NLCCX | RGEBX | NLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.09 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.09 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.426 | 13.886 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 815M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | 4.48 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.87 | 58.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.48 | 29.19 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.60 | 79.01 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement