Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGEBX
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$34.60
Change+$0.49 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.18M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.47
Change+$1.55 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NLCCX (830M). NLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. NLCCX (11.36). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. NLCCX (-16.75).
| NLCCX | RGEBX | NLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.09 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.09 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.688 | 14.040 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 830M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.36 | 13.78 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.29 | 47.56 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.75 | 38.26 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.08 | 99.55 | 30% |