Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGEBX
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$35.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.39M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.86
Change-$0.14 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (836M). NLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.04 vs. NLCCX (15.05). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. NLCCX (-9.97).
| NLCCX | RGEBX | NLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.09 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.09 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.609 | 17.385 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 17.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.99 | 57.65 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.97 | 45.42 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.07 | 93.79 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement