NLIBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
61.35M
SMMYY
Price
$7.50
Change
+$0.24 (+3.31%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLIBF vs SMMYY

Header iconNLIBF vs SMMYY Comparison
Open Charts NLIBF vs SMMYYBanner chart's image
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.21
Change-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization61.35M
Sumitomo Metal Mining
Price$7.50
Change+$0.24 (+3.31%)
Volume$47.96K
Capitalization8.83B
NLIBF vs SMMYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMMYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLIBF vs. SMMYY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLIBF is a Hold and SMMYY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (NLIBF: $0.22 vs. SMMYY: $7.93)
Brand notoriety: NLIBF and SMMYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLIBF: 198% vs. SMMYY: 73%
Market capitalization -- NLIBF: $61.35M vs. SMMYY: $8.83B
NLIBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $61.35M. SMMYY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLIBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMMYY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMMYY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMMYY is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLIBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMMYY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMMYY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the short-term than SMMYY.

Price Growth

NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMMYY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMYY($8.83B) has a higher market cap than NLIBF($61.4M). SMMYY YTD gains are higher at: 40.106 vs. NLIBF (19.444). SMMYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 204B vs. NLIBF (-19.63M). SMMYY has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. NLIBF (3.33M). NLIBF has less debt than SMMYY: NLIBF (2.03K) vs SMMYY (583B). SMMYY has higher revenues than NLIBF: SMMYY (1.53T) vs NLIBF (0).
NLIBFSMMYYNLIBF / SMMYY
Capitalization61.4M8.83B1%
EBITDA-19.63M204B-0%
Gain YTD19.44440.10648%
P/E RatioN/A78.06-
Revenue01.53T-
Total Cash3.33M177B0%
Total Debt2.03K583B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMMYY: Fundamental Ratings
SMMYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLIBFSMMYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMMYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBIT31.992.14
+7.17%
ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF
BBAG46.52-0.05
-0.11%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF
GAL48.69-0.22
-0.45%
SPDR® SSgA Global Allocation ETF
DRUP64.90-0.47
-0.71%
GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF
ETO27.23-0.20
-0.73%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Div Oppor Fund

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.73%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.44%
More

SMMYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMYY has been loosely correlated with SOUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMYY jumps, then SOUHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMMYY
1D Price
Change %
SMMYY100%
+5.73%
SOUHY - SMMYY
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
BDNNY - SMMYY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
GLNCY - SMMYY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
IVPAF - SMMYY
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
BHP - SMMYY
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
More