NLIBF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.04 (-14.81%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
39.06M
SRCGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.59M
Ad is loading...

NLIBF vs SRCGF

Header iconNLIBF vs SRCGF Comparison
Open Charts NLIBF vs SRCGFBanner chart's image
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.23
Change-$0.04 (-14.81%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization39.06M
HOMELAND NICKEL
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.83K
Capitalization1.59M
NLIBF vs SRCGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLIBF vs. SRCGF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLIBF is a Hold and SRCGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (NLIBF: $0.23 vs. SRCGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: NLIBF and SRCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLIBF: 324% vs. SRCGF: 18%
Market capitalization -- NLIBF: $39.06M vs. SRCGF: $1.59M
NLIBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $39.06M. SRCGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLIBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the long-term than SRCGF.

Price Growth

NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -12.71% price change this week, while SRCGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than SRCGF($1.59M). SRCGF YTD gains are higher at: 252.857 vs. NLIBF (27.778). SRCGF has more cash in the bank: 8.1M vs. NLIBF (3.88M).
NLIBFSRCGFNLIBF / SRCGF
Capitalization39.1M1.59M2,465%
EBITDAN/A-1.15M-
Gain YTD27.778252.85711%
P/E RatioN/A0.19-
RevenueN/A148K-
Total Cash3.88M8.1M48%
Total DebtN/A60K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRCGF: Fundamental Ratings
SRCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIVI32.04-0.70
-2.14%
Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF
CVIE56.98-1.37
-2.34%
Calvert International Responsible ETF
SETM13.43-0.67
-4.73%
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
VUG355.58-21.71
-5.75%
Vanguard Growth ETF
QVAL40.55-3.11
-7.12%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DUVNF - NLIBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.89%
ILKAF - NLIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCGF - NLIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCGF and IBATF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCGF and IBATF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCGF
1D Price
Change %
SRCGF100%
N/A
IBATF - SRCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
ATOXF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.78%
NLIBF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBRF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
SRLZF - SRCGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More