Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.37B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.96
Change-$0.18 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.99M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.37B vs. RLSFX (36M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.87 vs. RLSFX (7.45). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.48 vs. RLSFX (-1.94).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.250 | 1.289 | 252% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.37B | 36M | 20,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | 7.45 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.31 | 64.61 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.48 | -1.94 | -1,467% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.00 | 32.39 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement