Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.1B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$12.72
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.1B vs. RLSFX (33M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. RLSFX (-1.95). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.37 vs. RLSFX (-0.32).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.733 | -9.742 | 18% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.1B | 33M | 21,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | -1.95 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.67 | 3.96 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.37 | -0.32 | -9,280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.21 | 19.28 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...