Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.33M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. RLSFX (34.3M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. RLSFX (2.89). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. RLSFX (-8.91).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.059 | -5.516 | -37% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.33B | 34.3M | 21,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 2.89 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.84 | 31.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | -8.91 | -340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.58 | 22.70 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...