Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.41
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.56B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.32M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.56B vs. RLSFX (36.3M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. NLSAX (11.58). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.77 vs. RLSFX (-8.79).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.417 | 4.799 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.56B | 36.3M | 20,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.58 | 20.41 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.57 | 48.08 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.77 | -8.79 | -305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.42 | 35.48 | 139% |