Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs RLSIX
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$13.59
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.33M
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. RLSIX (34.3M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSAX (13 years) vs RLSIX (13 years). RLSIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSIX (17.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSAX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. RLSIX (4.55). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. RLSIX (-7.38).
| NLSAX | RLSIX | NLSAX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.059 | -4.846 | -42% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.33B | 34.3M | 21,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 4.55 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.84 | 41.00 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | -7.38 | -411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.58 | 27.19 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers