Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.24
Change-$0.24 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.80
Change-$0.51 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.34M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. WPOPX (419M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. WPOPX (2.25). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.03 vs. WPOPX (3.62).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.19 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.19 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.108 | 0.377 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 419M | 1,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 2.25 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | -10.45 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 3.62 | 995% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.51 | -23.64 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers