Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.41
Change+$0.17 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.26M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. WPOPX (412M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. WPOPX (3.46). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.28 vs. WPOPX (-14.81).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.19 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.19 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.521 | -0.151 | -2,334% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 412M | 1,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.09 | 3.46 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.71 | -4.43 | -332% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.28 | -14.81 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | -22.62 | -198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement