Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.75B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.58M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.75B vs. WPOPX (403M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. WPOPX (-0.49). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.11 vs. WPOPX (-12.33).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.013 | 2.489 | 242% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.75B | 403M | 1,924% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | -0.49 | -1,688% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.11 | 9.99 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | -12.33 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.97 | -8.44 | -651% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement