Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs NLSIX
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX (8.01B) and NLSIX (8.01B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NLSIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSCX (48.00) and NLSIX (48.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. NLSCX (6.50). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.56 vs. NLSCX (15.52).
| NLSCX | NLSIX | NLSCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.653 | 6.667 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.01B | 8.01B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 7.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 21.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.52 | 22.56 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.91 | 61.34 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement