Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs NLSIX
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.52
Change+$0.50 (+2.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.98B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.63
Change+$0.54 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.98B
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX (6.98B) and NLSIX (6.98B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NLSIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: NLSCX (13 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSCX (48.00) and NLSIX (48.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. NLSCX (0.41). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. NLSCX (21.99).
| NLSCX | NLSIX | NLSCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.787 | -3.520 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.98B | 6.98B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.41 | 1.54 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.41 | 6.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.99 | 29.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.51 | 38.57 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...