Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSIX
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.30
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$14.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.31M
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSIX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. RLSIX (36.3M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSIX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSIX (1.89). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSIX (10.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). RLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. NLSCX (6.95). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.61 vs. RLSIX (-4.13).
| NLSCX | RLSIX | NLSCX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.85 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.89 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.505 | 4.284 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 36.3M | 20,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 9.03 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.65 | 61.94 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.61 | -4.13 | -499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.76 | 35.92 | 97% |