Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SRUAX
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SRUAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.31B
Meeder Spectrum Adviser
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.31M
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SRUAX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SRUAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.31B vs. SRUAX (224M). SRUAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: SRUAX (1.24) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than SRUAX: NLSCX (13 years) vs SRUAX (9 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SRUAX (1.43). SRUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRUAX: NLSCX (1000) vs SRUAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. SRUAX (-2.31). SRUAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.61 vs. NLSCX (20.53).
| NLSCX | SRUAX | NLSCX / SRUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.865 | 0.732 | 255% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.31B | 224M | 3,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | -2.31 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.81 | 19.45 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 41.61 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.69 | N/A | - |