Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SRUAX
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SRUAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.86
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
Meeder Spectrum Adviser
Price$15.75
Change-$0.09 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.57M
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SRUAX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SRUAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.05B vs. SRUAX (249M). SRUAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: SRUAX (0.67) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than SRUAX: NLSCX (14 years) vs SRUAX (9 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SRUAX (1.43). SRUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRUAX: NLSCX (1000) vs SRUAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. SRUAX (3.56). SRUAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.69 vs. NLSCX (15.79).
| NLSCX | SRUAX | NLSCX / SRUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.953 | 15.021 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.05B | 249M | 3,231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 3.56 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.37 | 31.66 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.79 | 39.69 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers