Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs VLSCX
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$16.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.04M
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. VLSCX (57M). NLSCX (0.00) and VLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSCX (7 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSCX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSCX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. VLSCX (-0.60). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.24 vs. VLSCX (12.95).
| NLSCX | VLSCX | NLSCX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.03 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.109 | 1.980 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 57M | 12,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | -0.60 | -1,199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.91 | 6.25 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.24 | 12.95 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement