Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs VLSCX
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$16.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.21M
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. VLSCX (11.2M). NLSCX (0.00) and VLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSCX (14 years) vs VLSCX (7 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSCX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSCX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. VLSCX (0.18). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.71 vs. VLSCX (8.88).
| NLSCX | VLSCX | NLSCX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.03 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.240 | 2.413 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.52B | 11.2M | 67,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 0.18 | 5,054% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.89 | 8.74 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.71 | 8.88 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement