Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs VLSCX
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.15 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.07M
NLSCX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. VLSCX (53.1M). NLSCX (0.00) and VLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSCX (6 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSCX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSCX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. VLSCX (-7.89). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. VLSCX (16.56).
| NLSCX | VLSCX | NLSCX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.03 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 3.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.735 | -6.807 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.13B | 53.1M | 13,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | -7.89 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | -7.89 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 16.56 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...