Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs WPOIX
NLSCX vs WPOIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.56
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.08B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
Price$11.11
Change+$0.15 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.3M
NLSCX vs WPOIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOIX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.08B vs. WPOIX (383M). NLSCX (0.00) and WPOIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOIX: NLSCX (13 years) vs WPOIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOIX (1.92). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOIX (19.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOIX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOIX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.44 vs. WPOIX (-5.27). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.71 vs. WPOIX (-18.27).
| NLSCX | WPOIX | NLSCX / WPOIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.92 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.92 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.413 | -7.976 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.08B | 383M | 1,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | -5.27 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.39 | -15.89 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.71 | -18.27 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.17 | -36.46 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...