Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.99
Change+$0.07 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.75B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.06
Change+$0.13 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.43M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.75B vs. RLSFX (36.4M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. NLSIX (8.64). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 25.55 vs. RLSFX (-4.23).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.240 | 6.948 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.75B | 36.4M | 21,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 13.36 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.56 | 67.94 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.55 | -4.23 | -603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.82 | 47.08 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement