Ad is loading...
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.33M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. RLSFX (34.3M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. RLSFX (4.40). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.79 vs. RLSFX (-8.29).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.133 | -4.871 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.33B | 34.3M | 21,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 4.40 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.21 | 40.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.79 | -8.29 | -396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.91 | 24.45 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...