Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.94
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.79M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. RLSFX (35.8M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RLSFX (7.89). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.63 vs. RLSFX (-4.26).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.573 | -0.072 | -4,988% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 35.8M | 20,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 7.89 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.27 | 41.34 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.63 | -4.26 | -696% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.23 | 30.97 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers