Ad is loading...
NLSIX vs VLSRX
NLSIX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.54
Change-$0.24 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$16.35
Change-$0.42 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.92M
NLSIX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. VLSRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. VLSRX (55.9M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: VLSRX (0.46) vs NLSIX (0.02). NLSIX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSIX (13 years) vs VLSRX (6 years). VLSRX (2.05) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSIX (1000000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. VLSRX (-8.07). VLSRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. NLSIX (38.63).
| NLSIX | VLSRX | NLSIX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.96 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.05 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.160 | -3.008 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500000 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 55.9M | 12,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.46 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | -8.07 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | -5.11 | -180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.63 | 43.71 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...