Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs VLSRX
NLSIX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.48
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$17.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.04M
NLSIX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. VLSRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. VLSRX (57M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: VLSRX (0.44) vs NLSIX (0.02). NLSIX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSIX (13 years) vs VLSRX (7 years). VLSRX (2.05) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSIX (1000000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. VLSRX (0.89). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. VLSRX (19.94).
| NLSIX | VLSRX | NLSIX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.96 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.05 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.627 | 2.429 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500000 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 57M | 12,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.44 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 0.89 | 952% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.99 | 10.47 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.69 | 19.94 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement