Ad is loading...
NMAAX vs SQMAX
NMAAX vs SQMAX Comparison
Open Charts NMAAX vs SQMAX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.51M
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free A
Price$12.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.46M
NMAAX vs SQMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMAAX vs. SQMAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMAAX is a Hold and SQMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. SQMAX (196M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than SQMAX: NMAAX (3.28) vs SQMAX (2.76). NMAAX was incepted earlier than SQMAX: NMAAX (31 years) vs SQMAX (24 years). SQMAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.79). SQMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. NMAAX (31.00). NMAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SQMAX (3%) vs SQMAX (3%). SQMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: SQMAX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). SQMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.01 vs. NMAAX (-0.08). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.03 vs. SQMAX (-0.18).
| NMAAX | SQMAX | NMAAX / SQMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.85 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.92 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.740 | -1.767 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 153% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 196M | 224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 2.76 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | -0.01 | 888% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.44 | 5.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.03 | -0.18 | -582% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.66 | 13.51 | 57% |