Ad is loading...
NMANX vs PEMGX
NMANX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PEMGX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$15.80
Change+$0.35 (+2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
NMANX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PEMGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. NMANX (1.67B). NMANX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMANX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: NMANX (46 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). PEMGX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NMANX (0.85). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). NMANX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. NMANX (-5.74). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 66.77 vs. NMANX (7.22).
| NMANX | PEMGX | NMANX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.95 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.95 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.278 | -3.074 | 302% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 28.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.74 | 6.61 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.47 | 21.18 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.22 | 66.77 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.47 | 79.57 | 4% |