Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs VMGIX
NMANX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs VMGIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.28
Change+$0.24 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$108.00
Change+$0.77 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
NMANX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. VMGIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. NMANX (1.94B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than NMANX: VMGIX (0.54) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: NMANX (46 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). NMANX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: NMANX (1000) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.13 vs. NMANX (9.07). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 62.67 vs. NMANX (7.83).
| NMANX | VMGIX | NMANX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.19 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.19 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.931 | 7.437 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 29.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.07 | 19.13 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.79 | 39.40 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.83 | 62.67 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.93 | 158.57 | 12% |