Ad is loading...
NMBAX vs RBCUX
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs RBCUX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond M
Price$22.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94B
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. RBCUX commentary
Mar 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and RBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.74B vs. RBCUX (5.94B). RBCUX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: RBCUX (3.33) vs NMBAX (2.68). NMBAX was incepted earlier than RBCUX: NMBAX (30 years) vs RBCUX (8 years). RBCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. NMBAX (21.00). RBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: RBCUX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX (3.38) and RBCUX (3.33) have marching annual gain over last year. NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.36 vs. RBCUX (-2.43).
| NMBAX | RBCUX | NMBAX / RBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.886 | 1.434 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 5.94B | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 3.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 3.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.08 | 1.90 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.36 | -2.43 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers