Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMBAX vs RBCUX
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs RBCUX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.89B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond M
Price$21.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.9B
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. RBCUX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and RBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.89B vs. RBCUX (5.9B). RBCUX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: RBCUX (3.74) vs NMBAX (3.08). NMBAX was incepted earlier than RBCUX: NMBAX (30 years) vs RBCUX (8 years). NMBAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RBCUX (0.57). RBCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). RBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: RBCUX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). RBCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. NMBAX (-0.03). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.44 vs. RBCUX (-1.56).
| NMBAX | RBCUX | NMBAX / RBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.57 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.061 | 0.140 | -44% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.89B | 5.9B | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.74 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | 0.86 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.83 | 5.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.44 | -1.56 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers