Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMBAX vs RBCUX
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs RBCUX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond M
Price$21.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78B
NMBAX vs RBCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. RBCUX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and RBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. RBCUX (5.78B). RBCUX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: RBCUX (3.71) vs NMBAX (3.08). NMBAX was incepted earlier than RBCUX: NMBAX (30 years) vs RBCUX (8 years). NMBAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RBCUX (0.57). RBCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). RBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: RBCUX (0) vs NMBAX (3000). RBCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. NMBAX (1.43). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.41 vs. RBCUX (0.33).
| NMBAX | RBCUX | NMBAX / RBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.41 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.57 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.579 | -0.389 | 149% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | 5.78B | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.43 | 1.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.93 | 6.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.41 | 0.33 | 1,335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers