Ad is loading...
NMBAX vs TSSAX
NMBAX vs TSSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs TSSAX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
Thornburg Strategic Municipal Income A
Price$14.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.27M
NMBAX vs TSSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. TSSAX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and TSSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.8B vs. TSSAX (372M). TSSAX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: TSSAX (3.55) vs NMBAX (2.97). NMBAX was incepted earlier than TSSAX: NMBAX (30 years) vs TSSAX (16 years). TSSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.65). TSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.24 vs. NMBAX (24.00). NMBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than TSSAX (2%) vs TSSAX (2%). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSSAX: NMBAX (3000) vs TSSAX (5000). TSSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.56 vs. NMBAX (2.57). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.67 vs. TSSAX (1.34).
| NMBAX | TSSAX | NMBAX / TSSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.81 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.27 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.313 | 1.102 | 119% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.8B | 372M | 2,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 3.55 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 3.56 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.17 | 4.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.67 | 1.34 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.77 | 11.84 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...