Ad is loading...
NMCAX vs RPTIX
NMCAX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPTIX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$16.64
Change+$0.24 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets628.23M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$92.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.23B
NMCAX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPTIX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPTIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. NMCAX (628M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: RPTIX (0.05) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.34 vs. NMCAX (-15.61). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.01 vs. NMCAX (1.31).
| NMCAX | RPTIX | NMCAX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.63 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.63 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.653 | -7.387 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 628M | 27.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.61 | -13.34 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.84 | -3.65 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | 29.01 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers