Ad is loading...
NMCAX vs RPTIX
NMCAX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPTIX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$15.81
Change+$0.20 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599.34M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$87.82
Change+$1.50 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.97B
NMCAX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPTIX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. NMCAX (599M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: RPTIX (0.06) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). NMCAX (-18.70) and RPTIX (-18.94) have marching annual gain over last year. RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.51 vs. NMCAX (-11.41).
| NMCAX | RPTIX | NMCAX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.63 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.63 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.278 | -13.715 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 599M | 25B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.70 | -18.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.86 | -13.64 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.41 | 8.51 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...