Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs RPMGX
NMCCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.91
Change+$0.03 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets727.92M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
NMCCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. NMCCX (728M). NMCCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCCX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. NMCCX (-7.90). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. NMCCX (-53.73).
| NMCCX | RPMGX | NMCCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.998 | 1.735 | 403% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 728M | 27.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.90 | -0.10 | 8,022% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.71 | 5.40 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -53.73 | 1.47 | -3,653% |
| Returns for 10 years | -65.04 | 24.39 | -267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers