NMFC
Price
$10.12
Change
+$0.22 (+2.22%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
11 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$15.69
Change
+$0.14 (+0.90%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
837.41M
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMFC vs SLRC

Header iconNMFC vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts NMFC vs SLRCBanner chart's image
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.12
Change+$0.22 (+2.22%)
Volume$16.8K
Capitalization1.34B
SLR Investment
Price$15.69
Change+$0.14 (+0.90%)
Volume$4.84K
Capitalization837.41M
NMFC vs SLRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMFC vs. SLRC commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a StrongBuy and SLRC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (NMFC: $9.89 vs. SLRC: $15.55)
Brand notoriety: NMFC and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMFC: 75% vs. SLRC: 59%
Market capitalization -- NMFC: $1.34B vs. SLRC: $837.41M
NMFC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.34B. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than SLRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than SLRC.

Price Growth

NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.44% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFC($1.34B) has a higher market cap than SLRC($837M). SLRC has higher P/E ratio than NMFC: SLRC (10.84) vs NMFC (10.15). SLRC YTD gains are higher at: -1.381 vs. NMFC (-9.574). SLRC has less debt than NMFC: SLRC (1.18B) vs NMFC (1.79B). NMFC has higher revenues than SLRC: NMFC (144M) vs SLRC (86.5M).
NMFCSLRCNMFC / SLRC
Capitalization1.34B837M160%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.574-1.381693%
P/E Ratio10.1510.8494%
Revenue144M86.5M166%
Total CashN/A11.9M-
Total Debt1.79B1.18B152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC vs SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1616
SMR RATING
1..100
1113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5268
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRC (86). This means that NMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (16). This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (13). This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

SLRC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (76). This means that SLRC’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (68). This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMFCSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSEFX32.18N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden Equity
PCLVX19.89N/A
N/A
PACE Large Co Value Equity P
JMVIX14.70N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value S
ICSFX27.01N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock R6
SSEIX11.06N/A
N/A
SouthernSun U.S. Equity, I

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
+1.54%
FSK - NMFC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
ARCC - NMFC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
BCSF - NMFC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
TSLX - NMFC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
CCAP - NMFC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
More

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
+1.17%
ARCC - SLRC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
FDUS - SLRC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
NMFC - SLRC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
MFIC - SLRC
75%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
CSWC - SLRC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More