NMFC
Price
$11.21
Change
-$0.07 (-0.62%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:25 PM (EDT)
75 days until earnings call
TSLX
Price
$20.53
Change
-$0.16 (-0.77%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:34 PM (EDT)
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMFC vs TSLX

Header iconNMFC vs TSLX Comparison
Open Charts NMFC vs TSLXBanner chart's image
New Mountain Finance
Price$11.21
Change-$0.07 (-0.62%)
Volume$2.91K
CapitalizationN/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
Price$20.53
Change-$0.16 (-0.77%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NMFC vs TSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMFC vs. TSLX commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a Hold and TSLX is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NMFC: $11.28 vs. TSLX: $20.69)
Brand notoriety: NMFC and TSLX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMFC: 137% vs. TSLX: 95%
Market capitalization -- NMFC: $1.34B vs. TSLX: $1.94B
NMFC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.34B. TSLX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSLX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSLX is a better buy in the long-term than NMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSLX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NMFC and TSLX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while TSLX (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

TSLX is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLX($1.94B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($1.34B). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than TSLX: NMFC (10.15) vs TSLX (8.11). TSLX YTD gains are higher at: 5.712 vs. NMFC (-0.773). TSLX (1.78B) and NMFC (1.79B) have identical debt. TSLX has higher revenues than NMFC: TSLX (273M) vs NMFC (144M).
NMFCTSLXNMFC / TSLX
Capitalization1.34B1.94B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.7735.712-14%
P/E Ratio10.158.11125%
Revenue144M273M53%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.79B1.78B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC vs TSLX: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
TSLX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
877
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4722
SMR RATING
1..100
2414
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as TSLX (13). This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to TSLX’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (47). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (24). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (56). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TSLX's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (58). This means that TSLX’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMFCTSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSLX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEQZX13.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Hedged Equity Fund Z
FCSGX16.71N/A
N/A
Franklin Small Cap Growth C
HRLSX8.66-0.04
-0.46%
Hartford Real Asset R4
KLGIX53.07-0.31
-0.58%
NYLI WMC Growth Class I
RPTIX103.60-0.96
-0.92%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been loosely correlated with TSLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then TSLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-1.05%
TSLX - NMFC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
GBDC - NMFC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
BBDC - NMFC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
TCPC - NMFC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
SLRC - NMFC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More

TSLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLX has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSLX jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLX
1D Price
Change %
TSLX100%
+0.19%
ARCC - TSLX
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
MAIN - TSLX
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
NMFC - TSLX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
GBDC - TSLX
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
GLAD - TSLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More