It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NMG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSRCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NMG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSRCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
NMG (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while NSRCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +26.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.
NMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
NSRCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
NMG | NSRCF | NMG / NSRCF | |
Capitalization | 207M | 156M | 133% |
EBITDA | -27.14M | -18.87M | 144% |
Gain YTD | -44.828 | -48.490 | 92% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.20 | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 48.6M | 11.1M | 438% |
Total Debt | 57.5M | 11.2M | 513% |
NMG | NSRCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 24 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMG's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NSRCF (55). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to NSRCF’s over the last 12 months.
NSRCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (100). This means that NSRCF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.
NSRCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (98). This means that NSRCF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.
NSRCF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (64). This means that NSRCF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.
NSRCF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (100). This means that NSRCF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.
NMG | NSRCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago74% | 6 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | 9 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NMG and TOEYF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMG and TOEYF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NMG | 100% | +9.09% | ||
TOEYF - NMG | 30% Poorly correlated | -24.99% | ||
MP - NMG | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
ERO - NMG | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
MJDLF - NMG | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
TECK - NMG | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NSRCF and NMG have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSRCF and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSRCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NSRCF | 100% | +2.09% | ||
NMG - NSRCF | 15% Poorly correlated | +9.09% | ||
SKE - NSRCF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
REMRF - NSRCF | 9% Poorly correlated | -5.03% | ||
UROY - NSRCF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
USCUF - NSRCF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |