Ad is loading...
NMGCX vs PEMGX
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PEMGX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.21
Change-$0.40 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 28.5B vs. NMGCX (1.64B). NMGCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMGCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.95). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). NMGCX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. NMGCX (-10.53). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 63.85 vs. NMGCX (4.93).
| NMGCX | PEMGX | NMGCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.95 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.95 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.642 | -3.543 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 28.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.53 | 4.45 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.11 | 17.66 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.93 | 63.85 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.55 | 77.39 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...