Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PEMGX
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PEMGX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.48
Change+$0.23 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. NMGCX (1.94B). NMGCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMGCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). NMGCX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. NMGCX (7.61). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.04 vs. NMGCX (1.84).
| NMGCX | PEMGX | NMGCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.505 | 2.909 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 30.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 11.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | 33.84 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.84 | 45.04 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.99 | 92.40 | 14% |