Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBJX
NMGCX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBJX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
NMGCX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBJX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PMBJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. NMGCX (1.96B). PMBJX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBJX (0.06) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMBJX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). NMGCX (1000) and PMBJX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.46 vs. NMGCX (-8.74). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 25.52 vs. NMGCX (-18.03).
| NMGCX | PMBJX | NMGCX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.78 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.78 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.214 | -0.564 | -748% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 30.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | -6.46 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.41 | 32.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.03 | 25.52 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.53 | 89.12 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement