Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBPX
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. NMGCX (2.14B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. PMBPX (4.31). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. NMGCX (-4.75).
| NMGCX | PMBPX | NMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.823 | 5.476 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 33.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 4.31 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 54.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.75 | 40.37 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.34 | 109.43 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers