Ad is loading...
NMGCX vs PMBPX
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$16.63
Change-$0.65 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 29.6B vs. NMGCX (1.89B). NMGCX (0.00) and PMBPX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. PMBPX (10.10). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. NMGCX (2.78). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.10 vs. NMGCX (-1.64).
| NMGCX | PMBPX | NMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.713 | 1.864 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 29.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 12.43 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.55 | 27.85 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.64 | 35.10 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.09 | 92.30 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...