Ad is loading...
NMGCX vs VMGIX
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.21
Change-$0.40 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$90.04
Change-$3.25 (-3.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. NMGCX (1.64B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGIX (0.59) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGIX (14.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.89 vs. NMGCX (-10.53). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 72.25 vs. NMGCX (4.93).
| NMGCX | VMGIX | NMGCX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.642 | -6.530 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 27.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.53 | 2.89 | -365% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.11 | 10.74 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.93 | 72.25 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.55 | 120.69 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...