Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGIX
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$108.45
Change+$0.47 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.11B
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and VMGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. NMGCX (1.96B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGIX (0.51) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.33 vs. NMGCX (-8.74). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.84 vs. NMGCX (-18.03).
| NMGCX | VMGIX | NMGCX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.214 | 8.237 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 33.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.74 | 5.33 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.41 | 47.99 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.03 | 39.84 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.53 | 172.02 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement