Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$126.53
Change-$1.07 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.08B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. NMGCX (2.14B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.62) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. NMGCX (9.15). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 58.92 vs. NMGCX (-4.75).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.823 | 16.874 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 33.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 22.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 69.83 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.75 | 58.92 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.34 | 195.38 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers