Ad is loading...
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.37
Change+$0.16 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$100.40
Change+$1.85 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. NMGCX (1.62B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.71) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (14.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.67 vs. NMGCX (-12.54). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 69.50 vs. NMGCX (3.21).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.110 | -8.092 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 27.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.54 | 0.67 | -1,861% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.45 | 9.70 | -97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.21 | 69.50 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.86 | 117.57 | -4% |