Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.84
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$122.41
Change+$0.56 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.45B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. NMGCX (2B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.63) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.37 vs. NMGCX (4.78). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.77 vs. NMGCX (1.24).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.624 | 11.575 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 31.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.63 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 18.37 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.56 | 58.63 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | 64.77 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.84 | 164.86 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement