Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VFFSX
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VFFSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$30.49
Change+$0.12 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.32M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$329.90
Change+$1.22 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41T
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.41T vs. NMIAX (487M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VFFSX (1.15) vs NMIAX (0.68). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. NMIAX (4.75). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 96.82 vs. NMIAX (26.16).
| NMIAX | VFFSX | NMIAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.01 | 8,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.01 | 12,100% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.801 | 14.265 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 1.41T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 16.85 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.43 | 84.85 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.16 | 96.82 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers