Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VFFSX
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VFFSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$27.80
Change+$0.32 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.6M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$294.24
Change+$3.03 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43T
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.43T vs. NMIAX (508M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VFFSX (1.29) vs NMIAX (0.72). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. NMIAX (-1.71). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.91 vs. NMIAX (12.49).
| NMIAX | VFFSX | NMIAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.01 | 8,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.01 | 12,300% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.758 | 1.217 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 1.43T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.29 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.71 | 11.01 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.66 | 42.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.49 | 85.91 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement