Ad is loading...
NMIAX vs VFFSX
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VFFSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$24.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.59M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$258.55
Change+$0.35 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. NMIAX (479M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VFFSX (1.36) vs NMIAX (0.75). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.11 vs. NMIAX (-5.88). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 83.68 vs. NMIAX (15.13).
| NMIAX | VFFSX | NMIAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.01 | 8,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.01 | 12,300% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.895 | -10.257 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.88 | 5.11 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.61 | 20.28 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.13 | 83.68 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...