Ad is loading...
NMIAX vs VFFSX
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VFFSX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$26.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.75M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$277.16
Change-$0.14 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
NMIAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VFFSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.34T vs. NMIAX (511M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VFFSX (1.37) vs NMIAX (0.75). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). NMIAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: NMIAX (2000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. NMIAX (-3.93). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 93.27 vs. NMIAX (17.39).
| NMIAX | VFFSX | NMIAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.01 | 8,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.01 | 12,300% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.417 | -3.667 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.34T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.93 | 8.61 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.35 | 41.63 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.39 | 93.27 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...